The Silent Mimic: How Tropical Diseases Fool COVID-19 Antibody Tests

The Diagnostic Dilemma Under the Tropics

In tropical regions where fever could signal anything from dengue to typhus, a hidden challenge emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Antibody tests designed to detect SARS-CoV-2 began lighting up positive for people who didn't have COVID-19. This phenomenon of false positivity—where the immune response to one disease mimics another—created a perfect storm for misdiagnosis in areas already burdened by infectious diseases. A pivotal 2022 study from Thailand's front lines revealed how dengue and other tropical infections trick serological tests, forcing scientists to rethink diagnostic strategies in a world of overlapping outbreaks 1 2 .

The Cross-Reactivity Conundrum: When Antibodies Get Confused

The Immune System's Imperfect Tools

Antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) are the body's molecular "wanted posters"—custom-designed to recognize specific pathogens. Serology tests detect these antibodies to confirm infections. However, viruses from the same family—or even unrelated ones with similar surface proteins—can trigger cross-reactive antibodies. These molecules bind imperfectly to non-target viruses, creating false positives. During the pandemic, this became critical in tropical zones where dengue and COVID-19 cocirculated 1 7 .

Tropical Diseases: Prime Suspects

Dengue virus emerged as a major offender in false SARS-CoV-2 serology. Studies documented dengue patients testing positive for COVID-19 antibodies despite no SARS-CoV-2 infection. The reverse also occurred: COVID-19 patients showed false-positive dengue rapid tests. This two-way confusion risked misdirected treatments—like prescribing NSAIDs for "dengue" in a COVID-19 patient, potentially worsening outcomes 7 2 .

Table 1: False Positivity Rates in Non-COVID Tropical Disease Patients
Patient Group Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG
All non-COVID samples 10.6% (18/170) 5.3% (9/170) 1.8% (3/170)
Adults with dengue 11.3% 5.0% Not reported
Adults with other fevers 16.7% 13.3% Not reported
Data from the 2022 Thailand cohort study 1 2

Inside the Landmark Thailand Experiment: Unmasking False Positives

Methodology: A Pre-Pandemic Time Capsule

Researchers at Mahidol University's Faculty of Tropical Medicine designed a clever experiment using archived sera from before COVID-19 (2013–2019). This eliminated co-infection doubts. The samples included:

  • 170 non-COVID sera: From dengue, murine typhus, leptospirosis, and influenza patients, plus healthy controls.
  • 31 COVID-19 sera: For comparison 1 .

Samples were tested using EUROIMMUN ELISA kits:

  • IgA/IgG kits: Coated with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein fragments.
  • IgM kits: Used nucleocapsid protein (NCP).

Each sample was tested with/without urea dissociation—a technique that breaks weak antibody bonds to reduce false positives 1 2 .

Results: The Cross-Reactivity Culprits
  • 27/170 non-COVID samples showed false-positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (15.9%).
  • IgA was most error-prone (10.6%), followed by IgM (5.3%) and IgG (1.8%).
  • Dengue caused the highest false IgA/IgM rates, but murine typhus and leptospirosis also triggered cross-reactivity.
  • Urea treatment slashed false positives: True positives also declined, highlighting a trade-off between specificity and sensitivity 1 2 .
Table 2: Impact of Urea Dissociation on ELISA Results
Sample Type Standard ELISA ELISA + Urea Reduction
False positives 27/170 Significantly fewer* >50%
True positives (COVID) 31/31 Reduced* Moderate
*Descriptive trends per study data; exact figures not provided in text 1
Analysis: Why This Matters

The high IgA/IgM false positivity suggests these antibodies bind SARS-CoV-2 proteins with low avidity—a weak, nonspecific attachment. This makes them unreliable in regions with endemic flaviviruses (e.g., dengue, Zika). The study cautioned against using serology alone for COVID-19 diagnosis in acute fever patients in the tropics 1 7 .

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents in the Cross-Reativity Battle
Reagent/Technique Function Role in This Study
ELISA (IgA/IgG anti-S1) Detects antibodies against spike protein Primary test for IgA/IgG
ELISA (IgM anti-NCP) Detects IgM against nucleocapsid protein Primary test for IgM
Urea solution (4M) Disrupts hydrogen bonds in antibody-antigen complexes Reduced low-avidity false positives
RT-PCR assays Directly detects viral RNA Confirmed COVID-19/dengue infection
Pre-pandemic sera Biobanked samples from prior outbreaks Provided true negative controls

Beyond the Lab: Global Implications and Solutions

The Clinical Toll

In Singapore, Brazil, and Indonesia, patients with COVID-19 were misdiagnosed with dengue due to false-positive IgM tests—delaying COVID care. Conversely, dengue patients tested "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies faced unnecessary isolation 7 .

Diagnostic Solutions

The Thailand team proposed:

  • Prioritize molecular tests (RT-PCR) for acute fever in tropics.
  • Use urea dissociation to validate suspicious serology results.
  • Develop multiplex assays that simultaneously test for COVID-19/dengue 1 7 .
The Bigger Picture

Cross-reactivity isn't unique to COVID-19/dengue. Zika, chikungunya, and even HIV have triggered false alarms. As climate change expands the reach of tropical diseases, diagnostic specificity becomes a critical pillar of global health security 7 .

Conclusion: Embracing Diagnostic Humility in a Complex World

The Thai study exposed a harsh truth: in regions rife with tropical diseases, our serological tools can become double-edged swords. Yet, it also offered solutions—from urea washes to smarter test deployment.

As pathogens continue to cross borders, understanding immunological mimicry isn't just academic; it's the key to diagnosing accurately, treating swiftly, and preventing needless harm in the world's most vulnerable populations 1 7 .

Further Reading:
  • Luvira V. et al. (2022). Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 1 .
  • Review of false positives in dengue/COVID-19 (2023) 7 .

References