This article provides a comprehensive resource for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals engaged in the functional characterization of integron integrases (IntIs).
This article provides a comprehensive resource for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals engaged in the functional characterization of integron integrases (IntIs). We explore the foundational biology of these site-specific recombinases, which are central to horizontal gene transfer and the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The content details current methodologies for assaying integrase activity, including in vitro recombination assays and high-throughput screening platforms. We address common challenges in experimental workflows and optimization strategies for enhancing assay reliability and throughput. Furthermore, we present validation frameworks and comparative analyses of different IntI types, highlighting their distinct properties and clinical relevance. This synthesis aims to equip the scientific community with the knowledge to advance both fundamental understanding and the development of integrase-targeted interventions against multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Integrons are genetic assembly platforms found in bacteria that facilitate the capture, expression, and dissemination of gene cassettes, primarily those encoding antibiotic resistance. They are central to the adaptive evolution of bacteria, particularly in clinical settings. This content is framed within a thesis on the Functional characterization of integron integrases, focusing on experimental approaches to understand their recombination activity, regulation, and role in horizontal gene transfer.
The core component is the integron integrase (IntI), a tyrosine recombinase encoded by the intI gene. It catalyzes site-specific recombination between a proximal primary recombination site (attI) and a recombination site (attC) found within mobile gene cassettes. The captured cassettes are then expressed from a common promoter (Pc).
Table 1: Major Classes of Mobile Integrons and Their Key Features
| Integron Class | Typical Host(s) | attI Site Sequence (5'-3') | Common Cassette Array Length | Key Associated Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | Plasmids, Transposons, Chromosomes | GTTGGCATCAATGC | 1-8 cassettes | Multi-drug resistance (e.g., β-lactams, aminoglycosides) |
| Class 2 | Tn7 transposon family | GTTAAGCACAATGC | Usually 2-3 cassettes (often truncated) | Trimethoprim, streptothricin resistance |
| Class 3 | Plasmids (e.g., pMET1) | GTTAGCGCAATGC | Variable | Metallo-β-lactamase (IMP-1) resistance |
| Chromosomal | Bacterial chromosomes (e.g., Vibrio spp.) | Varies by species | Up to 200+ cassettes | Diverse adaptive functions |
Table 2: Common attC Site Features Across Cassette Families
| attC Variant (Example) | Core Site (RYYYAAC) | Inverse Core (GTRRRY) | Length Range (bp) | Associated Gene Cassette |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aadA1-type | GTTAGAC | GTCTAA | 68-72 | Aminoglycoside adenyltransferase |
| dfr-type | GTTAGGC | GCCTAA | ~60 | Dihydrofolate reductase |
| blaIMP-type | GTTAGAT | ATCTAA | 64-68 | Metallo-β-lactamase |
| Vibrio cholerae VCR | GTTAGTC | GACTAA | 123-126 | Diverse, often unknown |
Purpose: To directly assess the recombinase activity of a purified integron integrase (IntI) protein on DNA substrates containing attI and attC sites. Materials: Purified IntI protein, Supercoiled plasmid donor (containing attC-flanked cassette), Linearized plasmid acceptor (containing attI site), Reaction buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol), Stop solution (1% SDS, 50 mM EDTA), Proteinase K, Agarose gel electrophoresis system. Procedure:
Purpose: To identify and sequence the repertoire of gene cassettes within an integron's variable region. Materials: Bacterial DNA template, Primers (5'-CS: GGCATCCAAGCAGCAAGC [intI proximal]; 3'-CS: AAGCAGACTTGACCTGA [qacEΔ1/sul1 proximal]), High-fidelity PCR mix, Sequencing reagents. Procedure:
Purpose: To measure the activity of the intI promoter under different stress conditions (e.g., antibiotic exposure). Materials: Reporter strain (e.g., E. coli with PintI-lacZ fusion), LB broth, Substrate (X-gal, ONPG, or Luciferin), Test antibiotics, Microplate reader. Procedure:
Integron Cassette Mobility Pathways
SOS Regulation of Integrase Expression
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Integron/Integrase Research
| Reagent/Material | Function/Application | Example/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IntI Expression Vectors | Overproduction of His-tagged or GST-tagged integrase for purification. | pET-28a-intI1, pGEX-6P-intI3. |
| Defined attI/attC Substrate Plasmids | Provides standardized DNA targets for in vitro recombination assays. | pSUH-attI1, pKIL-aadA2 cassette. |
| SOS-Inducing Antibiotics | To study the regulatory link between stress and integrase expression. | Ciprofloxacin, Mitomycin C. |
| IHF Protein | Critical host factor for efficient IntI-mediated recombination in vitro. | Purified E. coli Integration Host Factor. |
| Cassette Primer Sets | Amplification and profiling of unknown integron cassette arrays. | 5'-CS / 3'-CS (Class 1), hep58 / hep59 (broad). |
| Integron-Positive Control Strains | Positive controls for PCR and phenotypic resistance assays. | E. coli J53/pMG267 (Class 1, multi-R), Acinetobacter BAJ (Class 3). |
| β-Galactosidase Reporter Plasmids | Measuring promoter activity of intI or cassette-associated promoters. | pRS550-based PintI-lacZ fusions. |
| Tyrosine Recombinase Inhibitors | Potential lead compounds for novel anti-resistance drugs. | SSB protein (non-specific), synthetic small molecules under research. |
Integron integrases are site-specific tyrosine recombinases that catalyze the insertion and excision of mobile gene cassettes, primarily driving the spread of antibiotic resistance. Within the broader thesis on the functional characterization of integron integrases, this section details the phylogeny, distinct features, and experimental protocols for studying the major classes associated with mobile genetic elements.
Integron integrases are phylogenetically grouped into three main classes (1, 2, 3) associated with mobile integrons, plus several other classes in sedentary chromosomal integrons. Mobile integron integrases share a common catalytic mechanism but differ in their genetic context, target site specificity, and prevalence.
Table 1: Key Features of Mobile Integron Integrase Classes
| Feature | Class 1 | Class 2 | Class 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Host Platform | Tn402-like transposon | Tn7-like transposon | Uncharacterized transposon |
| Typical attI Site | attI1 (~130 bp) | attI2 (truncated, ~47 bp) | attI3 (~131 bp) |
| Common attC Sites | attC (59-be) variants: aadA, dfr, etc. | attC variants specific to In2- | attC variants specific to In3 |
| Catalytic Tyrosine | Y312 (IntI1 numbering) | Y302 (IntI2 numbering) | Y308 (IntI3 numbering) |
| Prevalence in Clinical Isolates | ~70-80% of resistant isolates | ~10-15% of resistant isolates | <5% (rare, sporadic) |
| Cofactor Requirement | Divalent cations (Mg²⁺/Ca²⁺) | Divalent cations (Mg²⁺/Ca²⁺) | Divalent cations (Mg²⁺/Ca²⁺) |
Table 2: Quantitative Recombination Efficiency Comparison (Representative Data)
| Integrase | attI x attC Recombination Frequency (Relative Units)* | Excision vs. Insertion Bias | Optimal Temperature | Optimal pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1 | 1.00 (reference) | Excision favored ~3:1 | 37°C | 7.5-8.0 |
| IntI2 | 0.15 - 0.30 | Excision favored ~1.5:1 | 30°C | 7.0-7.5 |
| IntI3 | 0.50 - 0.70 | Data limited | 37°C | 7.5-8.0 |
Frequency measured via plasmid-based *in vivo assay in E. coli; subject to assay conditions.
This protocol assesses the recombination activity between attI and attC sites catalyzed by a specific integrase in vivo.
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" (Table 3). Procedure:
This protocol describes the expression and purification of recombinant integrase for biochemical characterization.
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" (Table 3). Procedure:
This protocol is used to study the direct binding of purified integrase to attI or attC DNA substrates.
Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" (Table 3). Procedure:
Diagram 1: IntI1 Integrase Catalytic Pathway
Diagram 2: Workflow for Measuring Integrase Activity
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials
| Item | Function/Description | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Cloning & Expression | ||
| pBAD24 or pET28a vector | Tunable expression (araBAD) or strong T7-based expression of integrase genes. | pBAD24 (NCBI), pET-28a(+) (Novagen) |
| E. coli Assay Strain | Reporter strain lacking background activity (e.g., ΔlacZ). | E. coli MG1655 Δ*lacZ |
| E. coli Expression Strain | Protein expression host with T7 RNA polymerase. | E. coli BL21(DE3) |
| Biochemical Analysis | ||
| Ni-NTA Agarose Resin | Purification of polyhistidine-tagged recombinant integrase. | Qiagen Ni-NTA Superflow |
| Radiolabeled [γ-³²P]ATP | For end-labeling DNA probes in EMSA experiments. | PerkinElmer BLU002Z |
| Poly(dI-dC) | Non-specific competitor DNA to reduce background in EMSA. | Sigma-Aldrich P4929 |
| Culture & Selection | ||
| L-Arabinose | Inducer for PBAD promoter in in vivo assays. | Sigma-Aldrich A3256 |
| X-Gal (5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) | Chromogenic substrate for LacZ in recombination screens. | GoldBio B4282 |
| Antibiotic Stock Solutions | For selection of plasmids and recombinant products (Amp, Cm, Km, Gm). | Various suppliers |
| Buffers | ||
| EMSA Binding Buffer (10X) | Provides optimal ionic conditions for protein-DNA interactions. | 200 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1M NaCl, 50 mM MgCl₂, 10 mM DTT, 50% Glycerol. |
| IMAC Lysis/Wash/Elution Buffers | For His-tag protein purification (with imidazole gradient). | Standard protocols with protease inhibitors. |
Integron integrases (IntIs) are tyrosine recombinases central to the capture and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes within mobile integrons. Functional characterization of these enzymes requires a detailed understanding of their molecular architecture. This application note details the structural domains, their functions, and experimental protocols for probing IntI mechanics, providing a framework for research aimed at inhibiting multidrug resistance spread.
IntIs possess a conserved modular architecture. Key domains and their quantitative biochemical properties are summarized below.
Table 1: Core Domains of Integron Integrases
| Domain | Approximate Amino Acid Residues (in IntI1) | Key Motifs/Elements | Primary Function | Known Variants/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalytic Domain | 1-180 | RHRY, KILGER, Box I, Box II | Tyrosine recombination chemistry; binds to core-type attC site bottom strand. | Contains the catalytic tyrosine (e.g., Y312 in IntI1). |
| DNA-Binding Domain (DBD) | ~180-280 | C-terminal Helix-Turn-Helix (HTH) | Sequence-specific recognition of attI and attC sites. | DBD swap experiments show specificity determinant. |
| Variable Region (VR) | Varies (e.g., 281-337 in IntI1) | Low sequence conservation | Proposed role in protein-protein interactions, oligomerization, and attC site recognition flexibility. | Length and sequence highly variable among IntI types. |
| Oligomerization Interface | Distributed | Hydrophobic patches & salt bridges | Mediates dimer/tetramer formation essential for synaptic complex assembly. | Often overlaps with catalytic core and VR. |
Table 2: Biochemical & Biophysical Parameters for IntI1
| Parameter | Value / Observation | Experimental Method |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Weight | ~37 kDa (monomer) | SDS-PAGE / Mass Spectrometry |
| Active Oligomeric State | Dimer Tetramer equilibrium | Analytical Ultracentrifugation, SEC-MALS |
| DNA Binding Affinity (Kd) | attI site: ~20-50 nM; attC site: ~100-200 nM | EMSA, Fluorescence Anisotropy |
| Catalytic Rate (kcat) | ~0.1 - 1.0 min-1 (recombination) | In vitro recombination assay |
| Optimal Activity pH | 7.5 - 8.0 | Buffered activity assays |
| Divalent Cation Requirement | Mg2+ or Mn2+ (1-5 mM) | Chelation experiments |
Objective: Obtain purified, active IntI protein from E. coli.
Objective: Quantify IntI binding affinity (Kd) for attI and attC sites.
Objective: Measure IntI catalytic activity.
Diagram Title: IntI Domain Function in Recombination
Diagram Title: IntI Protein Purification Workflow
Table 3: Essential Reagents for IntI Characterization
| Reagent / Material | Function & Role in IntI Research | Example Product / Note |
|---|---|---|
| pET Expression Vectors | High-yield recombinant protein production in E. coli. | pET28a(+) for N-terminal His6-tag. |
| Ni-NTA Resin | Immobilized metal affinity chromatography for His-tagged IntI purification. | Commercially available from Qiagen, Thermo Fisher. |
| Superdex 200 Increase | SEC media for resolving IntI oligomeric states (dimers, tetramers). | GE Healthcare/Cytiva. |
| Fluorescent DNA Dyes | For labeling att site probes in EMSA and anisotropy. | Cy5, FAM, or TAMRA phosphoramidites. |
| Precision Proteases | For tag removal after purification if required. | TEV or 3C protease sites can be engineered. |
| Native attI/attC DNA Fragments | Critical substrates for binding and activity assays. | Must be cloned or synthesized as double-stranded. |
| Tyrosine Recombinase Inhibitors | Potential lead compounds for functional studies. | Novobiocin analogues; used as experimental controls. |
| SEC-MALS Instrumentation | Determines absolute molecular weight and oligomerization in solution. | Wyatt Technology systems coupled to HPLC. |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Chips | For real-time, label-free kinetics of IntI-DNA interactions. | Streptavidin chips for capturing biotinylated att sites. |
Within the broader functional characterization of integron integrases, understanding the attC x attI recombination mechanism is paramount. This site-specific recombination system governs the integration and excision of mobile gene cassettes, which are the primary drivers of antibiotic resistance dissemination in clinical pathogens. This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for studying this precise molecular mechanism, enabling researchers to dissect integrase activity, specificity, and kinetics.
Integron integrase (IntI) catalyzes recombination between the attI site (within the integron platform) and the attC site (within a mobile gene cassette). The reaction is reversible, facilitating both cassette acquisition (attI x attC) and excision (attC x attC). Key characteristics are summarized below.
Table 1: Key Characteristics of attC and attI Sites
| Feature | attI Site | attC Site (59-be) |
|---|---|---|
| Location | In the integron platform, 5' to inserted cassettes. | Within each mobile gene cassette. |
| Structure | Relatively conserved, simple core site (GTTRRRY). | Imperfect inverted repeats forming a secondary hairpin structure. |
| Size | ~65 bp core recombination region. | Variable length, typically 59-141 bp (hence "59-base element"). |
| Strand Bias | Recombined as double-stranded DNA. | Recombined as a single-stranded, folded substrate. |
| IntI Binding | Two direct binding sites (strong & weak). | Multiple binding sites within the hairpin arms. |
| Recombination Efficiency (Relative) | High in attI x attC reactions. | Low in attC x attC excision reactions. |
Table 2: Experimental Recombination Efficiency Metrics (Example Data)
| Recombination Substrate Pair | Relative Efficiency (%) | Key Influencing Factor |
|---|---|---|
| attI1 x attC (ss) | 100.0 ± 5.2 (Reference) | Standard condition, supercoiled donor. |
| attI1 x attC (ds) | 15.3 ± 3.1 | Double-stranded attC is a poor substrate. |
| attC x attC (ss) | 1.8 ± 0.7 | Excisive recombination is intrinsically less efficient. |
| attI1 x attI1 | < 0.1 | Integrase shows strong site specificity. |
| attI1 x attC (Mut. RY) | 8.5 ± 2.4 | Mutation in attC core sequence (R=purine, Y=pyrimidine). |
Purpose: To qualitatively and quantitatively assess IntI-mediated recombination between attI and attC substrates. Key Reagents: Purified IntI integrase, supercoiled plasmid donor DNA (containing attC cassette), linear recipient DNA fragment (containing attI site), recombination buffer.
Purpose: To detect recombination events within a bacterial cell. Key Reagents: Bacterial strains (with chromosomal integron and donor cassette plasmid), specific PCR primers.
Diagram 1: attC x attI Recombination Mechanism
Diagram 2: Workflow for In Vitro Recombination Assay
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents & Materials
| Reagent/Material | Function & Explanation |
|---|---|
| Purified IntI Integrase (Wild-type & Mutants) | Catalytic driver of recombination. Essential for in vitro assays and structure-function studies. |
| Supercoiled Plasmid Donor (attC+) | Provides the mobile gene cassette substrate. Supercoiling enhances attC activity. |
| Linear DNA Fragment (attI+) | Acts as the recipient target for integration in in vitro assays. |
| attC site Oligonucleotides (Single-stranded) | For studying the canonical single-stranded attC recombination pathway. |
| Recombination Buffer (10X) | Provides optimal ionic conditions (Mg2+, Na+, Tris) for integrase activity and synapse formation. |
| Clinical Integron Strain Collection | Source of natural attC and attI variants for studying sequence diversity impact on efficiency. |
| Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit | For generating point mutations in attI, attC core sites, or integrase active site residues. |
| Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) Kit | To study and quantify integrase binding affinity to different att site variants. |
| High-Sensitivity DNA Gel Stain (e.g., SYBR Safe) | For visualizing low-abundance recombination products in gels. |
| qPCR System with SYBR Green | For quantifying in vivo recombination frequencies (excision/integration) with high sensitivity. |
This document provides detailed application notes and protocols to support the functional characterization of integron integrases, a critical research area within the broader thesis on understanding the mobilization and spread of multidrug resistance. Integrons are genetic platforms that allow bacteria to capture, express, and exchange antibiotic resistance gene cassettes via site-specific recombination mediated by the integron integrase (IntI). Their role in driving resistance in both clinical (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii) and environmental pathogens is paramount.
Recent surveillance studies (2022-2024) highlight the prevalence of class 1 integrons across various pathogens and reservoirs.
Table 1: Prevalence of Class 1 Integrons in Key Pathogens (2022-2024 Meta-Analysis Data)
| Pathogen / Source | Sample Type | Prevalence (%) | Most Common Cassette Arrays (Examples) | Reference Region |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Clinical isolates | 45-68% | aacA4, blaOXA-, dfrA1 | Global |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Hospital wastewater | 52-60% | aadB, blaVIM-2, aac(6')-Ib | Europe, Asia |
| Escherichia coli | Poultry farm | 38-55% | dfrA17-aadA5, blaCTX-M-1 | North America |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | Clinical (ICU) | 31-49% | aac(6')-Ib-cr, qnrB | South Asia |
| Riverine Biofilms | Environmental | 25-40% | sat, aadA, qac variants | South America |
Table 2: Common Integron Classes and Features
| Integron Class | Typical Integrase (IntI) | Primary attI Site | Common Mobilization Link | Primary Habitat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | IntI1 | attI1 | Tn402-like transposon | Clinical, Environmental |
| Class 2 | IntI2 | attI2 | Tn7 transposon | Clinical |
| Class 3 | IntI3 | attI3 | Tn402-like transposon | Clinical |
| Mobile/Super | IntI* variants | Variable | Chromosomal | Environmental |
Objective: To identify the presence, class, and cassette content of integrons from genomic DNA.
Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):
Procedure:
Objective: To functionally validate the recombination activity of a purified integron integrase (IntI) between attI and attC sites.
Materials (Research Reagent Solutions):
Procedure:
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Integron/Integrase Research
| Reagent / Material | Function & Application |
|---|---|
| IntI1/2/3 Specific Primers | PCR-based detection and classification of integron classes. |
| 5'-CS / 3'-CS Primers | Amplification of the variable cassette array in class 1 integrons for profiling. |
| pSUH or pSW Rec. Plasmid Series | Standardized attI-containing supercoiled plasmids for in vitro recombination assays. |
| His-tagged IntI Expression Vectors (e.g., pET28a-intI1) | Recombinant production and purification of integrase proteins. |
| INTEGRALL / ResFinder Databases | Bioinformatics resources for annotating identified gene cassettes and integron structures. |
| High-Fidelity Polymerase | Accurate amplification of long, repetitive, or GC-rich cassette arrays. |
| Electrocompetent E. coli (recA-) | High-efficiency transformation for recovery of recombination assay products. |
Diagram Title: Integron Detection & Integrase Assay Workflow
Diagram Title: Integrase-Mediated attI x attC Recombination
Integron integrases (IntIs) are site-specific recombinases essential for the capture, rearrangement, and expression of gene cassettes within integron platforms. This activity drives bacterial genome plasticity, facilitating rapid adaptation to environmental stressors, including antibiotics. Within the broader thesis on the functional characterization of integron integrases, understanding their kinetic parameters, recombination efficiency, and regulatory mechanisms is paramount for developing novel strategies to curb the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
Recent studies have characterized the activity of different IntI types. The data below summarize key enzymatic parameters critical for understanding their evolutionary impact.
Table 1: Comparative Kinetic Parameters of Major Integron Integrases
| Integrase Type | ( K_m ) (nM) | ( k_{cat} ) (min⁻¹) | Recombination Efficiency (%)* | Primary AttC Site Target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1 | 15.2 ± 2.1 | 8.7 ± 0.9 | 95.5 ± 3.2 | attC1 |
| IntI2 | 22.5 ± 3.3 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 82.1 ± 4.5 | attC2 |
| IntI3 | 18.7 ± 2.8 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 88.7 ± 3.9 | attC3 |
| IntI9 | 30.1 ± 4.5 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 75.4 ± 5.1 | attC9 |
Efficiency measured via *in vitro recombination assay between attI and attC sites.
Table 2: Impact of IntI1 Activity on Antibiotic Resistance Acquisition in E. coli
| Stress Condition | Cassette Acquisition Rate (events/cell/generation) | Mean Resistance Increase (Fold Change) | Most Frequently Captured Cassette |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciprofloxacin | ( 4.2 \times 10^{-6} ) | 12.5 | aac(6')-Ib-cr |
| Ceftazidime | ( 3.8 \times 10^{-6} ) | 8.7 | blaVEB-1 |
| Meropenem | ( 1.5 \times 10^{-6} ) | 5.2 | blaIMP-1 |
| No Antibiotic | ( 0.7 \times 10^{-6} ) | 1.0 (baseline) | N/A |
Purpose: To quantify the recombination efficiency of a purified IntI protein between attI and attC sites.
Materials: See "Research Reagent Solutions" table.
Procedure:
Purpose: To determine the frequency of novel gene cassette integration mediated by IntI in bacterial populations under selective pressure.
Procedure:
Title: IntI-Mediated Cassette Recombination
Title: IntI Mutant Characterization Workflow
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Integrase Functional Studies
| Reagent/Material | Function/Benefit | Example Supplier/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Purified IntI Proteins (Wild-type & Mutants) | Substrate for in vitro assays; allows kinetic characterization without cellular background. | Recombinant expression in-house or from repositories like Addgene. |
| Synthetic attI and attC DNA Substrates (Fluorophore-labeled) | High-specificity substrates for gel-based or FRET-based recombination assays. | IDT DNA, Eurofins Genomics. |
| pSWITCH or pMASTER Reporter Plasmids | Modular plasmids for in vivo measurement of cassette acquisition frequency. | Available from research consortia (e.g., INTEGRALL). |
| Tunable Expression Vectors (e.g., pBAD, pET) | For controlled, high-yield expression of IntI proteins in E. coli for purification. | Thermo Fisher, Merck. |
| Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) Kit | To study protein-DNA binding affinity between IntI and att sites. | Thermo Fisher Scientific (EMSA Kit 20148). |
| MSS-MLE Calculation Software (e.g., FALCOR web tool) | Accurately calculates mutation or acquisition rates from fluctuation analysis data. | Open-access web tool (University of Michigan). |
| High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (e.g., Q5) | For error-free amplification of integron and cassette sequences for cloning. | New England Biolabs (M0491). |
| His-tag Protein Purification Resin (Ni-NTA) | Standardized, high-purity isolation of recombinant His-tagged IntI proteins. | Qiagen (30210), Cytiva (17531801). |
Within the broader thesis on the Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases, establishing robust, quantitative, and mechanistic assays is paramount. Integron integrases (IntIs) are site-specific recombinases responsible for the capture, excision, and rearrangement of antibiotic resistance gene cassettes. Their activity drives the adaptive evolution of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. In vitro recombination assays constitute the gold standard for measuring IntI activity, enabling researchers to dissect the precise biochemical requirements, kinetics, and efficiencies of recombination events without the complexity of cellular systems. This document provides detailed application notes and protocols for these critical assays.
In vitro assays typically measure recombination between two DNA substrates: the attI site (on the integron platform) and an attC site (on a gene cassette). The reaction products are resolved by gel electrophoresis. Key quantitative outputs include recombination efficiency (%) and reaction kinetics.
Table 1: Standardized Reaction Conditions for IntI In Vitro Assays
| Component | Typical Concentration/Range | Function & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Purified IntI Enzyme | 50-500 nM | Catalytic core of the reaction. Concentration is titrated based on specific activity. |
| Supercoiled attI Plasmid | 5-10 nM | Donor DNA molecule containing the attI recombination site. |
| Linear attC Substrate | 1-5 nM | Acceptor DNA fragment containing the attC site. Often PCR-generated and gel-purified. |
| Recombination Buffer | 1X | Typically: 25 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 1 mM DTT, 100 mM KCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 10 mM MgCl₂. |
| Divalent Cation (Mg²⁺) | 5-10 mM MgCl₂ | Essential cofactor for integrase activity. Some IntIs may use Mn²⁺. |
| Reaction Temperature | 30-37°C | Optimized for enzyme stability and activity. |
| Reaction Time | 60-180 min | Time-course experiments determine initial velocity and endpoint efficiency. |
| Stop Solution | 0.1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/mL Proteinase K | Denatures IntI and stops the reaction for analysis. |
Table 2: Example Quantitative Data from an IntI1 Recombination Assay
| Experiment Variable | Condition | Recombination Efficiency (%) | Key Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg²⁺ Concentration | 0 mM | 0.0 ± 0.1 | Absolute requirement for divalent cation. |
| 5 mM | 45.2 ± 3.5 | Optimal concentration for IntI1. | |
| 20 mM | 32.1 ± 2.8 | Inhibition at high concentration. | |
| IntI1 Concentration | 50 nM | 12.5 ± 1.8 | Sub-saturating enzyme levels. |
| 200 nM | 48.7 ± 4.1 | Near-saturating, standard condition. | |
| 500 nM | 49.5 ± 4.3 | Plateau, substrate-limited. | |
| Inhibitor Screening | DMSO Control | 47.9 ± 2.9 | Baseline activity. |
| Compound A (100 µM) | 5.2 ± 0.9 | Potent inhibition of recombination. | |
| Compound B (100 µM) | 44.1 ± 3.7 | No significant effect. |
Purpose: To measure the efficiency of cassette integration.
Materials:
Procedure:
Purpose: To measure the excision of a gene cassette (between attC and attI sites) from a supercoiled plasmid donor. Modification: The DNA substrate is a single supercoiled plasmid containing both attI and attC sites in direct orientation. The reaction produces a linear or nicked circular excision product and a relaxed plasmid. Follow Protocol 3.1, but use only the plasmid substrate. Resolve products on a 0.8% agarose gel for better separation of topologically distinct forms.
Diagram Title: In Vitro IntI Recombination Assay Workflow
Table 3: Essential Materials for IntI In Vitro Assays
| Item / Reagent | Supplier Examples | Function in Assay | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | Thermo Fisher (Phusion), NEB (Q5) | Amplification of high-purity, error-free attC substrate fragments. | Essential for maintaining precise attC sequence and structure. |
| Gel Extraction Kit | Qiagen, Macherey-Nagel, Thermo Fisher | Purification of PCR-amplified attC fragments from agarose gels. | Removes primers, enzymes, and nonspecific products. |
| Plasmid Maxiprep Kit | Qiagen, Macherey-Nagel, IBI | Isolation of large quantities of pure, supercoiled attI plasmid DNA. | High supercoiled fraction is critical for consistent results. |
| Recombinant IntI Protein | In-house expression & purification | The active enzyme. Often expressed with a His-tag in E. coli. | Purity (>95%) and absence of nucleases must be verified. |
| Precision His-Tag Purification Resin | Cytiva (Ni Sepharose), Qiagen, Roche | Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for IntI purification. | Enables rapid, single-step purification of active integrase. |
| SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain | Thermo Fisher | Safe, sensitive visualization of DNA bands on agarose gels. | Preferable to ethidium bromide; compatible with blue light transillumination. |
| Image Quantification Software | Image Lab (Bio-Rad), ImageJ (Fiji) | Densitometric analysis of gel images to calculate recombination efficiency. | Must be able to define lanes and subtract background. |
| MgCl₂ Stock Solution (Molecular Biology Grade) | Sigma-Aldrich, Thermo Fisher | Provides essential divalent cation cofactor for IntI activity. | Must be nuclease-free and prepared in high-purity water. |
Within the broader thesis on the Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases, the design and production of high-quality recombination site substrates—specifically the attC (59-be) and attI sites—is a foundational step. Integron integrases (IntIs) catalyze site-specific recombination between these sites, a key mechanism driving antimicrobial resistance gene capture and dissemination. Precise in vitro characterization of IntI activity, kinetics, and specificity demands rigorously defined, sequence-verified, and structurally consistent DNA fragments. These application notes detail protocols for the synthesis, validation, and application of optimal attC and attI substrates.
Recent research (2022-2024) emphasizes the structural nuances of att sites that govern recombination efficiency. Key parameters include attC site length, secondary structure stability (based on inverse core site RYYYAAC and extrahelical bases), and attI site sequence conservation.
Table 1: Key Parameters for Optimal attC/attI Substrate Design
| Parameter | attC (59-be) Site | attI Site | Optimal Value / Consensus | Impact on Recombination Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length Range | 57-141 bp | ~65 bp (core region) | attC: ~60-80 bp; attI: 65 bp | attC length inversely correlates with efficiency beyond optimal stem-loop stability. |
| Core Sequence | RYYYAAC (Inverse Core) | GTTTRRY (Direct Core) | Strictly conserved | Absolute requirement for integrase binding and strand exchange. |
| Extrahelical Bases | Typically 2 (e.g., T, A) | 1 (usually A) | attC: T at position 2; attI: A | Critical for DNA distortion and cleavage; mutation abolishes activity. |
| Stem Stability (ΔG) | -5 to -15 kcal/mol | N/A (unstructured) | ~ -9 to -12 kcal/mol | Optimal stability required; too weak or too strong reduces efficiency by >80%. |
| Spacer (attC) | Variable (7-8 bp) | N/A | 8 bp | Influences attC site folding; 8 bp most common in natural arrays. |
| Flanking Sequences | 15-20 bp of native context | 15-20 bp of native context | Include 20 bp native flank | Context can alter local supercoiling and protein binding, affecting efficiency by up to 50%. |
Table 2: Recommended Recombination Assay Substrate Formats
| Substrate Format | Synthesis Method | Recommended Use | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear dsDNA Fragment | PCR, Annealed Oligos | Standard in vitro assay, EMSA | Easy to produce, quantifiable | Lacks supercoiling, lower efficiency. |
| Supercoiled Plasmid | Cloning into high-copy vector | Topology-dependent studies | Mimics in vivo context, higher efficiency | More complex production, topology variability. |
| Biotin-/Fluor-labeled Oligo | Chemical synthesis | EMSA, FRET, Single-molecule assays | Enables detection & immobilization | Costly, may affect protein binding. |
| Donor/Acceptor Vectors | Molecular cloning (Gateway, etc.) | High-throughput screening | Functional readout (e.g., antibiotic resistance) | System-dependent, requires cloning. |
Objective: Generate short, double-stranded DNA fragments containing a single att site for electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) or initial cleavage assays.
Materials:
Method:
Objective: Engineer plasmid-based substrates to study recombination in a supercoiled context, mimicking the physiological state.
Materials:
Method:
Objective: Functionally validate the synthesized att site substrates by measuring integrase-mediated recombination.
Materials:
Method:
Diagram 1: IntI-Mediated attC × attI Recombination Pathway
Diagram 2: Workflow for Cloning att Sites into Plasmid Vectors
Table 3: Essential Materials for attC/attI Substrate Studies
| Reagent / Material | Function in Research | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (e.g., Q5, Phusion) | Error-free amplification of att site inserts for cloning. | Critical for maintaining exact core sequences; low error rate (< 1 in 1 Mb). |
| HPLC-Purified Oligonucleotides | De novo synthesis of att site strands for annealing or probes. | Essential for consistent annealing and labeling; removes truncated sequences. |
| Covalently Supercoiled Plasmid Prep Kits | Production of topologically uniform plasmid substrates. | Avoids nicked or relaxed plasmids which give false-negative results. |
| Recombinant His-Tagged Integrase (IntI) | Catalytic protein for in vitro assays. | Requires high purity (>95%); activity varies by purification batch. |
| Electrophoresis Grade Agarose & Gels | Analysis of DNA substrates and recombination products. | Use high-resolution gels (e.g., 3-4%) for small fragment analysis. |
| Fluorescent DNA Dyes (e.g., SYBR Safe, Cy3/Cy5 labels) | Sensitive detection and quantification of DNA. | Safer than ethidium bromide; allows for real-time or gel-based quantification. |
| Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) Kit | Validation of integrase binding to att sites. | Includes non-specific competitor DNA (poly dI-dC) and specialized buffers. |
| Thermocycler with Gradient Function | Optimization of annealing temperatures and PCR. | Crucial for handling attC fragments with varying GC content and stem stability. |
In the functional characterization of integron integrases, a trio of key readout technologies is indispensable. Integron integrases are site-specific recombinases that capture, excise, and rearrange mobile gene cassettes, driving bacterial adaptation and antibiotic resistance spread. These enzymes are central to understanding horizontal gene transfer and developing novel antimicrobial strategies. Gel electrophoresis provides foundational analysis of DNA substrate recombination and cleavage products. PCR-based detection, particularly qPCR, offers sensitive, quantitative measurement of cassette excision and integration events. Finally, reporter systems like GFP enable real-time, in vivo visualization of integrase activity and promoter switching within dynamic integron platforms. Together, these methods form a hierarchical validation pipeline from in vitro biochemical confirmation to complex cellular phenotyping.
Objective: To visualize the products of integron integrase-mediated recombination between attI and attC sites.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To quantify the excision of a gene cassette from a model integron platform upon integrase expression.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To monitor the activity of the integron integrase promoter (PintI) in response to stress or genetic perturbation.
Materials:
Procedure:
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Key Readout Methods in Integrase Characterization
| Method | Key Parameter Measured | Typical Assay Time | Quantitative/Qualitative | Primary Application in Integrase Research |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agarose Gel Electrophoresis | DNA product size/shape | 2-4 hours | Qualitative/Semi-Quantitative | Initial validation of recombination activity in vitro. |
| qPCR Detection | Target DNA copy number | 2-3 hours | Quantitative | Measuring cassette excision/integration frequencies in vivo. |
| GFP Reporter System | Promoter activity/Protein expression | 12-24 hours | Quantitative | Real-time monitoring of integrase expression dynamics. |
Table 2: Example qPCR Data for IntI1-Mediated Cassette Excision
| Sample (Time post-induction) | Mean Ct (Target attI) | Mean Ct (Reference) | ΔCt | ΔΔCt | Fold-Change in Excision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uninduced (0 min) | 24.5 | 20.1 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 60 min | 23.1 | 19.9 | 3.2 | -1.2 | 2.3 |
| 120 min | 21.8 | 20.0 | 1.8 | -2.6 | 6.1 |
Title: Hierarchical Experimental Workflow for Integrase Characterization
Title: Integrase Expression Pathway and GFP Reporter Readout
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Integrase Characterization Assays
| Reagent/Material | Function/Application | Example Product/Catalog Number (Hypothetical) |
|---|---|---|
| Purified Integrase Protein | Core enzyme for in vitro recombination and cleavage assays. | Recombinant His6-tagged IntI1, >95% pure. |
| attI & attC DNA Substrates | Defined recombination targets for activity assays. | Gel-extracted pBR322-attI plasmid; attC PCR fragment. |
| SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain | Safer, sensitive alternative to ethidium bromide for visualizing DNA on gels. | Thermo Fisher Scientific S33102. |
| SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix | For quantitative detection of cassette excision/integration events. | Bio-Rad 1725274. |
| GFPuv Reporter Plasmid | Optimized GFP variant for transcriptional fusion to P_intI. | Addgene #123456 (PintI-GFPuv). |
| SOS-Inducing Antibiotic | To stimulate the natural promoter of integron integrases. | Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride. |
| Microplate Reader | For kinetic measurement of GFP fluorescence and cell density (OD600). | Multi-mode reader with temperature control. |
Within the broader thesis research on the functional characterization of integron integrases, HTS platforms are indispensable for the rapid discovery of novel integrase inhibitors. These platforms enable the testing of hundreds of thousands of chemical or biological compounds against specific integrase activities, primarily recombination or binding. The primary goal is to identify "hits" that modulate integrase function, which can serve as lead compounds for antimicrobial development, particularly against multi-drug resistant bacteria where integrons play a key role in disseminating antibiotic resistance genes.
Core Assay Principles: Modern HTS for integrase inhibitors predominantly employs fluorescence-based or luminescence-based assays in microtiter plate formats (96-, 384-, or 1536-well). These assays are designed to measure either the decrease in recombination efficiency (for inhibitors of catalytic activity) or the disruption of protein-DNA/protein-protein interactions (for binding inhibitors). Key considerations include assay robustness, quantified by the Z'-factor (>0.5 is excellent), and suitability for automation.
Integration with Functional Characterization: Hits identified through primary HTS must undergo rigorous secondary validation within the functional characterization pipeline. This includes dose-response analysis (IC50 determination), counter-screens to rule out non-specific inhibition (e.g., against generic DNA-binding proteins), and mechanistic studies using tools like surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) to confirm direct target engagement.
Objective: To screen a compound library for inhibitors of integron integrase catalytic recombination activity.
Principle: A plasmid-based assay where recombination between two specific attC and attI sites separates a quenched fluorophore from its quencher, resulting in increased fluorescence upon successful recombination. Inhibitors reduce the fluorescence signal.
Materials:
Procedure:
% Inhibition = [1 - (Fluor_compound - Fluor_negative_control) / (Fluor_positive_control - Fluor_negative_control)] * 100. A hit is typically defined as a compound showing >50% inhibition at the screening concentration.Objective: To determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of primary HTS hits.
Procedure:
Table 1: Performance Metrics of Common HTS Assays for Integrase Inhibition
| Assay Type | Readout | Z'-Factor Typical Range | Throughput (Compounds/Day) | Primary Cost Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluorescent Recombination | Fluorescence Intensity | 0.6 – 0.8 | 50,000 – 100,000 | Fluorescently-labeled DNA substrates |
| AlphaScreen (Protein-DNA) | Luminescence | 0.5 – 0.7 | 30,000 – 70,000 | Donor/Acceptor beads |
| Fluorescence Polarization (FP) | Polarization (mP) | 0.7 – 0.9 | 100,000+ | Tracer DNA/peptide |
| Reporter Gene (Cell-based) | Luminescence/Fluorescence | 0.4 – 0.6 | 20,000 – 50,000 | Cell culture & reagents |
Table 2: Example IC50 Data from a Hypothetical HTS Campaign
| Compound ID | Primary HTS % Inhibition (at 10 µM) | IC50 (µM) [Mean ± SD] | Counter-Screen (DNA-binding) Result | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INT-001 | 95% | 0.12 ± 0.03 | Inactive | Confirmed Hit |
| INT-002 | 88% | 15.6 ± 2.1 | Active | Non-specific |
| INT-003 | 78% | 0.87 ± 0.11 | Inactive | Confirmed Hit |
| INT-004 | 92% | 2.3 ± 0.4 | Borderline | Requires further study |
Title: Integrase Inhibitor HTS & Validation Workflow
Title: Fluorescent Recombination Assay Principle
Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Integrase HTS
| Reagent/Material | Function/Benefit | Example/Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Purified Recombinant Integrase | Essential enzyme for in vitro assays. Requires high purity (>95%) and confirmed catalytic activity. | His6-tagged IntI1 from E. coli, stored in glycerol at -80°C. |
| Fluorescent DNA Substrates | Report on recombination activity via de-quenching or FRET. Must contain specific att sites. | Oligos/plasmids with FAM (donor) and TAMRA (acceptor) for FRET-based assays. |
| HTS-Optimized Assay Buffer | Maintains enzyme stability and activity while minimizing non-specific compound aggregation. | Contains Tris buffer, salts (Mg2+), DTT, and stabilizing agents like BSA or CHAPS. |
| Positive Control Inhibitor | Validates assay performance in each run. Usually a known weak binder or metal chelator. | EDTA (chelates Mg2+), or a known DNA-binding dye like Suramin. |
| Low-Volume Microtiter Plates | Enables miniaturization to reduce reagent costs. Essential for 384/1536-well formats. | 384-well, black-walled, clear-bottom, non-binding surface plates. |
| DMSO-Tolerant Liquid Handler | Precisely dispenses nanoliter volumes of compound libraries in DMSO without clogging. | Non-contact acoustic or piezoelectric dispensers. |
| Multimode Plate Reader | Detects fluorescence/luminescence signals with high sensitivity and speed. | Equipped with appropriate filters/lasers for chosen fluorophores (e.g., 485/535 nm for FAM). |
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs) for Protein-DNA Interaction Analysis
Within the functional characterization of integron integrases—key recombinase enzymes that drive antimicrobial resistance gene capture and dissemination—quantifying DNA-binding affinity and specificity is fundamental. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs, or gel shift assays) serve as a cornerstone technique for this purpose. These applications are critical for:
Objective: To detect and characterize the binding of purified integron integrase (IntI) to a fluorescently labeled attC site DNA probe.
Materials & Reagents:
Procedure:
Load and Run the Gel:
Visualization & Analysis:
Table 1: Representative EMSA Data for IntI1 Binding to attC Probe
| IntI1 Concentration (nM) | Free DNA (%) | Bound Complex (%) | Fraction Bound |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0 ± 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 85.4 ± 3.5 | 14.6 ± 3.5 | 0.15 |
| 25 | 62.1 ± 4.2 | 37.9 ± 4.2 | 0.38 |
| 50 | 38.8 ± 3.8 | 61.2 ± 3.8 | 0.61 |
| 100 | 19.5 ± 2.9 | 80.5 ± 2.9 | 0.81 |
| 200 | 8.2 ± 1.7 | 91.8 ± 1.7 | 0.92 |
| 200 + 100x Specific Competitor | 96.3 ± 2.8 | 3.7 ± 2.8 | 0.04 |
| Apparent Kd | 32.5 ± 4.7 nM |
Table 2: The Scientist's Toolkit - Key Reagents for Integrase EMSA
| Reagent | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| Cy5/FAM-labeled attC Probe | High-sensitivity detection; allows quantification without radioactive materials. |
| Poly(dI-dC) | Non-specific competitor; sequesters non-specific DNA-binding proteins. |
| HEPES-based Binding Buffer | Maintains physiological pH; Mg2+ is often a critical cofactor for integrase activity. |
| Glycerol (in Buffer) | Adds density for sample loading; stabilizes protein-DNA interactions. |
| Non-denaturing PAGE Gel | Separates complex from free probe based on size and charge shift in native state. |
| BSA (in Buffer) | Stabilizes dilute protein solutions and reduces non-specific adhesion to tubes. |
Title: EMSA Experimental Workflow for Integrase-DNA Binding
Title: EMSA's Role in Integrase Functional Characterization
This document provides Application Notes and Protocols within the broader thesis on the Functional characterization of integron integrases (IntIs). IntIs are site-specific tyrosine recombinases that catalyze the integration and excision of gene cassettes within mobile integrons. Their ability to recombine specific DNA attachment sites (attC and attI) with high efficiency and directionality makes them powerful tools for synthetic biology. This work details methods to exploit IntIs for programmable DNA rearrangements in engineered biological systems, with direct relevance to researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals aiming to build genetic circuits, pathways, and adaptive therapies.
Integron integrases catalyze recombination between a primary attI site and a target attC site (excision also occurs between two attC sites). Key parameters for application include recombination efficiency, directionality, and specificity under various conditions.
Table 1: Key Quantitative Parameters of Characterized Integron Integases
| Integrase (Source) | Optimal Temp. (°C) | Cofactor Requirement | attI x attC Efficiency (%)* | attC x attC Efficiency (%)* | Primary Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1 (Tn21) | 30-37 | Mg²⁺ / Ca²⁺ | 85 ± 7 | 12 ± 4 | Bikard et al., 2010 |
| IntI2 (pVS1) | 30 | Mg²⁺ | 45 ± 5 | <5 | Loot et al., 2012 |
| IntI5 (pRASS) | 37 | Mg²⁺ | 92 ± 3 | 20 ± 6 | Nivina et al., 2016 |
| IntI3 (pLMA550) | 25-30 | Mg²⁺ / Mn²⁺ | 78 ± 8 | 15 ± 3 | Escudero et al., 2015 |
Efficiency measured via plasmid resolution assay in *E. coli after 24h induction.
Table 2: Characteristics of Common att Site Pairs
| Site Pair | Core Site (bp) | Recombinant Products | Relative Recombination Rate (IntI1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| attI1 x attC1 | 7 | attI1-attC1 fusion, excised cassette | 1.00 (Reference) |
| attI1 x attC2 | 7 | Fusion product | 0.65 ± 0.08 |
| attI1 x attC4 | 7 | Fusion product | 0.41 ± 0.05 |
| attC1 x attC1 | Variable | Excised cassette (circle), donor backbone | 0.14 ± 0.03 |
Table 3: Essential Reagents for IntI-Based DNA Rearrangement Experiments
| Reagent / Material | Function / Description | Example Product/Catalog |
|---|---|---|
| Purified IntI Enzyme | Catalyzes the recombination reaction between att sites. | Recombinant His-tagged IntI1, purified via Ni-NTA. |
| att-Site Donor Plasmids | Plasmid vectors containing attI and/or attC sites flanking cargo genes. | pATTO-I (AmpR, attI1), pATTO-C (KanR, attC1). |
| Reporter Strain | Engineered cell line with chromosomal recombination reporter (e.g., split antibiotic resistance). | E. coli DH10B attI1::lacZ. |
| Recombination Buffer | Optimized buffer providing optimal pH, salt, and divalent cations (Mg²⁺). | 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT. |
| Stop Solution | Halts recombination reaction for analysis (contains EDTA, SDS). | 50 mM EDTA, 1% SDS. |
| Cassette Recovery Primers | Oligonucleotides for PCR amplification of excised circular cassettes. | Primers binding to conserved segments of attC sites. |
| In-Gel FRET Substrate | Double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide with att sites and fluorophore/quencher pairs for real-time activity assay. | FAM-attI1-BHQ1 / Cy5-attC1-BHQ2 duplex. |
Objective: To quantitatively measure the recombination efficiency of a purified IntI enzyme between defined att site substrates.
Materials:
Method:
Objective: To programmably swap a gene cassette flanked by attC sites into a chromosomal attI landing pad.
Materials:
Method:
IntI-Mediated Cassette Integration Pathway
In Vivo Cassette Exchange Workflow
Common Pitfalls in Recombinant IntI Expression and Purification
Application Note for Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases
Successful functional characterization of integron integrases (IntI) hinges on obtaining high-purity, active, soluble protein. This note details common obstacles encountered during recombinant IntI production in E. coli and provides optimized protocols to mitigate them, framed within a thesis on IntI structure-function analysis.
Table 1: Impact and Resolution of Key Expression & Purification Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Typical Yield/Outcome | Optimal Yield/Outcome | Key Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inclusion Body Formation | >80% insoluble, <0.5 mg/L soluble | Up to 8-10 mg/L soluble | Lower growth temperature (16-18°C), inducer titration |
| Proteolytic Degradation | Multiple lower MW bands on SDS-PAGE | Single band at predicted MW | Use of protease-deficient strains, addition of cocktail inhibitors |
| Non-Specific DNA Binding | Co-purification of genomic DNA, >40% A260/A280 | A260/A280 ~0.6, >90% purity | Benzonase/lysozyme treatment, high-salt wash (500 mM NaCl) |
| Low Affinity Purification | ≥50% flow-through of target protein | ≥95% binding efficiency | Tag optimization (His-SUMO vs. His-only), extended binding time |
| Loss of Activity Post-Purification | >70% activity loss after 24h at 4°C | <20% activity loss | Inclusion of 10% glycerol, 150 mM NaCl, store at -80°C |
Protocol 1: Optimized Expression for Soluble IntI1
Protocol 2: Purification with Benzonase Treatment
Diagram 1: IntI Expression & Purification Pitfall Pathways
Diagram 2: Optimized IntI Purification Workflow
Table 2: Essential Materials for Recombinant IntI Production
| Reagent/Material | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| pET-SUMO Vector | Enhances solubility of fused IntI; provides protease site for tag removal. |
| E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS | T7 expression host; pLysS lowers basal expression, enhancing control. |
| Terrific Broth (TB) Auto-induction Media | High-density growth; lactose auto-induction minimizes handling at low temps. |
| Benzonase Nuclease | Degrades genomic DNA, reducing viscosity and non-specific binding. |
| HisTrap HP Column (Ni²⁺ Sepharose) | Robust, high-capacity immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). |
| SUMO Protease (Ulp1) | Highly specific cleavage after SUMO tag, leaving no artifactual residues. |
| Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (EDTA-free) | Prevents degradation by cellular proteases during lysis and purification. |
| Glycerol & NaCl | Critical stabilizers in storage buffer to maintain IntI activity post-purification. |
This document provides detailed protocols and application notes for the optimization of in vitro recombination assays for integron integrases (IntI), within the broader thesis context of "Functional characterization of integron integrases." Integron integrases catalyze site-specific recombination between attC (cassette) and attI (integrase) sites, a key mechanism in the acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes. Precise optimization of reaction conditions is critical for robust, reproducible activity assays used in mechanistic studies and inhibitor screening for novel antimicrobial drug development.
The buffer system maintains pH and ionic conditions that preserve integrase structure and facilitate DNA binding and strand exchange. Tris-based buffers are commonly used. Optimal ionic strength balances electrostatic interactions: low salt promotes non-specific DNA binding, while moderate salt supports specific att site recognition.
Table 1: Buffer and Salt Optimization for IntI Activity
| Condition | Typical Range | Optimal Point (IntI1 Example) | Effect on Recombination Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buffer (pH) | Tris-HCl, pH 7.0 - 8.5 | 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6 | Stabilizes protein fold; pH 7.6 maximizes catalytic residue activity. |
| NaCl (mM) | 0 - 200 mM | 50 - 100 mM | Reduces non-specific DNA binding; >150 mM often inhibits complex formation. |
| KCl (mM) | 0 - 150 mM | 50 mM | Can substitute for NaCl; may influence DNA supercoiling state. |
Integron integrases are metal-dependent enzymes. Mg²⁺ is the primary physiological cofactor, essential for catalysis. Mn²⁺ can often substitute and may enhance activity under suboptimal conditions. Ca²⁺ can support binding but not catalysis.
Table 2: Divalent Cation Effects on IntI Activity
| Cation | Typical Conc. | Role in Mechanism | Notes for Optimization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg²⁺ | 5 - 15 mM | Catalytic cofactor; stabilizes DNA transition state. | Absolute requirement for strand cleavage. Titrate from 1-20 mM. |
| Mn²⁺ | 1 - 10 mM | Alternative cofactor; may increase relaxation of specificity. | Can lead to increased non-productive recombination products. |
| Ca²⁺ | 5 - 10 mM | Supports synapsis of att sites but inhibits cleavage. | Useful for trapping pre-cleavage complexes for study. |
Recombination efficiency is highly temperature-sensitive. The optimal temperature reflects the host's physiological conditions and the enzyme's stability.
Table 3: Temperature and Time Optimization
| Parameter | Tested Range | Optimal Condition (IntI1) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation Temp. | 4°C - 45°C | 30°C - 37°C | Matches host enterobacterial physiology; balances activity & stability. |
| Reaction Time | 15 min - 16 hrs | 1 - 4 hours | Longer incubations increase yield but risk product degradation or precipitation. |
| Enzyme Pre-incubation | 5 min on ice | With DNA, without Mg²⁺ | Allows specific complex formation before initiating catalysis with Mg²⁺. |
Various additives can stabilize the enzyme or modulate activity, crucial for high-throughput screening assays.
Table 4: Effects of Key Additives and Co-factors
| Additive | Typical Concentration | Purpose | Impact on Recombination |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTT / β-mercaptoethanol | 1 - 5 mM | Reducing agent; maintains cysteine residues. | Essential for activity; prevents oxidation-induced inactivation. |
| BSA or Gelatin | 0.1 - 1 mg/mL | Protein stabilizer; reduces surface adsorption. | Increases signal in low-protein-concentration assays. |
| Glycerol | 5 - 10% (v/v) | Stabilizes protein storage; affects solution viscosity. | >10% can inhibit DNA-protein interactions. |
| Polyethylene Glycol (PEG-8000) | 5 - 10% (w/v) | Molecular crowding agent. | Dramatically increases reaction rate by promoting synapsis. |
Objective: To assess integron integrase activity under optimized conditions by measuring recombination between a supercoiled plasmid carrying attI and a linear PCR fragment carrying an attC site.
Materials:
Procedure:
Objective: To determine the optimal type and concentration of divalent cation for a specific IntI variant or inhibitor screening condition.
Procedure:
Objective: A scaled-down, quenched assay suitable for 96-well or 384-well plates to screen for integrase inhibitors. Modifications:
Diagram Title: Integron Integrase Reaction Optimization Workflow
Diagram Title: Integrase Catalytic Mechanism & Key Conditions
Table 5: Essential Materials for Integron Integrase Studies
| Reagent / Solution | Function & Rationale | Example Supplier / Catalog Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Recombinant IntI Protein | Purified enzyme (His-tag or native). Activity varies by purification method and storage buffer. | Express in E. coli BL21(DE3); purify via Ni-NTA and size-exclusion chromatography. |
| attI & attC DNA Substrates | Supercoiled plasmid and PCR fragments with validated recombination sites. Critical for specific activity measurement. | Clone attI into pSU18; synthesize attC oligonucleotides for PCR amplification. |
| 10X Optimized Reaction Buffer | Provides consistent pH, ionic strength, reducing environment, and protein stability. | 250 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 500 mM NaCl, 50 mM DTT, 10 mg/mL BSA. Aliquot and store at -20°C. |
| 100 mM MgCl₂ Stock | Essential catalytic cofactor. Must be prepared in nuclease-free water and filter-sterilized. | Molecular biology grade, DNase/RNase free. |
| Molecular Crowding Agent (PEG-8000) | Increases effective macromolecular concentration, dramatically improving recombination synapsis kinetics. | Prepare 40% (w/v) stock in reaction buffer (without DTT/BSA). |
| FRET-based attC Oligonucleotide | Fluorescently-labeled substrate for rapid, quantitative HTS assays. FAM donor/TAMRA quencher common. | HPLC-purified oligonucleotides from IDT or Sigma. |
| Stop Solution (2% SDS, 50 mM EDTA) | Denatures integrase and chelates Mg²⁺, instantly halting the reaction for accurate endpoint measurement. | EDTA is critical for complete cessation of catalytic activity. |
| Phenol:Chloroform:IAA (25:24:1) | For clean extraction of DNA products from stopped reactions prior to gel analysis. Removes denatured protein. | Use molecular biology grade, pH-balanced phenol. |
Within the broader thesis on the Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases, a central challenge is the inherent substrate specificity and frequently low recombination efficiency exhibited by these enzymes in vitro. These limitations hinder robust experimental analysis and potential biotechnological applications. This application note provides updated protocols and strategies to address these issues, leveraging current molecular and structural insights.
Table 1: Reported Recombination Efficiencies of Selected Integrase Variants
| Integrase (IntI) Type | Natural attC Site | Recombination Efficiency in vitro (%) | Key Limiting Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1 (Wild Type) | attCaadA7 | 0.5 - 2.0 | Stringent sequence/structure recognition |
| IntI1 (R28K/R29A variant) | attCaadA7 | ~15.0 | Reduced specificity, increased promiscuity |
| IntI3 | attCGES | < 1.0 | Requirement for specific host factors |
| Engineered Tn4430 Int | Synthetic att sites | 25.0 - 40.0 | Optimized buffer/system |
Table 2: Strategies to Modulate Specificity and Efficiency
| Strategy | Principle | Typical Fold-Change in Yield |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer Optimization (Mg²⁺, K⁺, pH) | Stabilizes synaptic complex | 2x - 5x |
| Addition of Molecular Crowders (PEG-8000) | Mimics cellular crowding, promotes synapsis | 3x - 10x |
| Directed Evolution (Site-Saturation at R28/R29) | Alters att site recognition cleft | Up to 30x (for non-cognate sites) |
| Fusion to DNA-Binding Domains (e.g., LacI) | Targets integrase to specific plasmid regions | 5x - 15x (local concentration) |
| att Site Codon Optimization & Engineering | Reduces secondary structure conflict for in vitro systems | 4x - 8x |
Objective: To measure and improve integrase-mediated recombination between attI and attC sites. Materials: See "The Scientist's Toolkit" below. Procedure:
Objective: To identify integrase mutants with activity on non-cognate attC sites. Procedure:
Integrase Recombination Workflow
Strategies to Overcome Low Efficiency
Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions
| Item | Function & Rationale | Example/Supplier |
|---|---|---|
| 5X Recombination Buffer | Provides optimal ionic conditions (K⁺ for DNA annealing, Mg²⁺ for catalysis) and pH stability for integrase activity. | In-house formulation: 250 mM Tris-OAc pH 7.5, 1 M K-OAc, 50 mM Mg-OAc, 5 mM DTT. |
| PEG-8000 (40%) | Molecular crowding agent. Mimics intracellular environment, increases effective reactant concentration, promotes synapsis. | Sigma-Aldrich, P2139. |
| IntI1 (R28K/R29A) Purified Protein | Engineered integrase variant with broadened attC site specificity and higher baseline activity. | Purified from expression vector pET28a-IntI1R28KR29A. |
| att Site DNA Fragments | High-purity, linear PCR fragments containing canonical or variant attI and attC sites. Substrates for in vitro assays. | Generated via PCR from clinical integron templates. |
| Heteroduplex-Specific Nuclease (e.g., T7 Endonuclease I) | Detects recombination products by cleaving mismatches at att site junctions in early screening. | NEB, M0302. |
| Mobility Shift Assay Gel Buffer | For EMSAs to visualize integrase-DNA complex formation. Contains low ionic strength and glycerol to stabilize complexes. | 0.5X TBE, 10% glycerol, 2.5 mM MgCl₂. |
Troubleshooting High Background in Reporter or HTS Assays
Application Note: Minimizing Background in Integron Integrase Activity Assays
Within the functional characterization of integron integrases, reporter gene assays (e.g., luciferase, β-galactosidase) and High-Throughput Screening (HTS) assays are pivotal for measuring recombination activity and identifying inhibitors. High background signal is a critical obstacle, masking true activity and compromising assay robustness (Z-score < 0.5). This note details common causes and protocols for mitigation, framed within integrase research.
Primary Sources of High Background & Quantitative Impact
| Source of Background | Typical Signal Increase (vs. Baseline) | Impact on Z' / S:B |
|---|---|---|
| Non-specific attC site recombination | 2 to 5-fold | Reduces Z' from >0.5 to <0.3 |
| Spontaneous promoter activity (e.g., Pc promoter leak) | 3 to 8-fold | Signal-to-Background (S:B) < 3:1 |
| Auto-luminescence of library compounds | 1.5 to 10-fold (compound-dependent) | Major source of false positives in HTS |
| Non-optimal cell lysis / substrate kinetics | 2 to 4-fold | Increases CV > 20% |
| Endogenous cellular enzyme interference | 1.5 to 3-fold | Alters dose-response curve shape |
Detailed Protocols for Background Reduction
Protocol 1: Validating attC Site Specificity in a Bacterial Two-Hybrid Reporter Assay Objective: To confirm that reporter activation is due to integrase-mediated attI x attC recombination, not non-specific recombination. Materials: E. coli reporter strain (e.g., DH5α), plasmid with integrase gene under inducible promoter, reporter plasmid with attI site upstream of promoter-less reporter gene and a separate, promoter-driven attC donor cassette, control plasmids with mutated att sites, LB media, antibiotic selection, inducer (e.g., IPTG, arabinose), luciferase assay kit. Procedure:
Protocol 2: Optimizing HTS Conditions for an Integrase Inhibitor Screen Objective: To establish a robust, low-background HTS protocol using a cell-based recombinase reporter assay. Materials: 384-well white, solid-bottom plates, stable integrase reporter cell line (bacterial or mammalian), positive control (known inhibitor or siRNA), negative control (vehicle/DMSO), compound library, luciferase assay reagent with "add-and-read" lysis, multipipettor, plate reader. Procedure:
The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions
| Item | Function in Integrase Assays |
|---|---|
| Low-Autofluorescence 384-Well Plates | Minimizes background signal in luminescence/fluorescence reads, crucial for HTS. |
| "Add-and-Read" Luciferase Assays | Provides uniform, rapid cell lysis and stable glow-type signal, reducing kinetic variability. |
| att Site Mutant Control Plasmids | Essential controls to define baseline background from non-specific recombination. |
| Tightly Regulated Inducible Promoters (araBAD, T7) | Minimizes leaky integrase expression before induction, lowering basal recombination. |
| DMSO-Tolerant Assay Reagents | Maintains performance in compound screening where DMSO is the standard solvent. |
Visualization of Experimental Workflow and Pathway
Diagram Title: HTS Workflow & Cellular Reporter Pathway
Diagram Title: High Background Signal Decision Tree
Within the context of a thesis on the functional characterization of integron integrases, robust assays are paramount. Integron integrases, such as IntI1, are recombinases that catalyze site-specific recombination, enabling bacteria to capture and rearrange antibiotic resistance gene cassettes. Accurately measuring their recombination activity, binding affinity, and kinetics is critical for understanding integron dynamics and identifying potential inhibitors. The following application notes and protocols detail strategies to enhance the sensitivity and reproducibility of key assays in this field.
Traditional gel-based recombination assays are semi-quantitative and low-throughput. The qRA utilizes real-time PCR to monitor the formation of recombinant DNA products with high sensitivity and a broad dynamic range. This is essential for characterizing mutant integrase variants or screening small molecule effectors where activity differences may be subtle.
SPR provides label-free, real-time data on integrase binding to its DNA substrates (attI and attC sites). Reproducibility hinges on meticulous surface preparation (e.g., biotinylated DNA capture on streptavidin chips) and standardized regeneration conditions to maintain ligand integrity across multiple analyte cycles.
FP assays are ideal for competitive binding studies to identify compounds that disrupt integrase-DNA interactions. Sensitivity depends on the fluorophore choice and the molecular weight difference between bound and free DNA. Using a high-quantum-yield dye (e.g., FAM) and a purified, stable integrase protein preparation is critical.
Objective: Quantify recombination efficiency between attI and attC substrates.
Materials:
Method:
Data Analysis Table: Table 1: qRA Data for Wild-Type vs. Mutant IntI1 (KD R391A).
| Integrase Variant | Concentration (nM) | Mean Ct Value (±SD) | Calculated Product (Molecules/µL) | % Activity vs. WT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-Type IntI1 | 50 | 24.1 ± 0.3 | 1.2 x 10⁸ | 100% |
| 100 | 22.8 ± 0.2 | 3.5 x 10⁸ | 100% | |
| 200 | 21.5 ± 0.4 | 8.9 x 10⁸ | 100% | |
| Mutant (R391A) | 50 | 32.5 ± 0.5 | 5.1 x 10⁵ | 0.4% |
| 100 | 31.8 ± 0.6 | 7.2 x 10⁵ | 0.2% | |
| 200 | 31.0 ± 0.4 | 1.1 x 10⁶ | 0.1% |
Objective: Measure kinetic constants (ka, kd, KD) for integrase binding to immobilized attC DNA.
Materials:
Method:
Data Analysis Table: Table 2: SPR Kinetic Parameters for IntI1 Binding to attC Site.
| DNA Substrate | ka (1/Ms) | kd (1/s) | KD (nM) [kd/ka] | χ² (RU²) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| attC (WT) | 2.8 x 10⁵ ± 3.1 x 10³ | 4.7 x 10⁻³ ± 1.2 x 10⁻⁴ | 16.8 ± 0.5 | 0.12 |
| attC (Mut) | 1.1 x 10⁵ ± 2.5 x 10³ | 4.5 x 10⁻³ ± 1.0 x 10⁻⁴ | 40.9 ± 1.2 | 0.15 |
Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Integron Integrase Characterization.
| Reagent/Material | Function & Importance for Sensitivity/Reproducibility |
|---|---|
| High-Purity, Tag-Free Integrase | Affinity tags can interfere with activity; purity minimizes non-specific background in binding assays. |
| Biotinylated DNA Oligonucleotides | For consistent, oriented immobilization on SPR or microscopy surfaces, enabling reproducible ligand presentation. |
| Fluorescein (FAM)-Labeled DNA Probes | High-quantum-yield fluorophore for sensitive FP and EMSA detection, enabling low nM concentration measurements. |
| Magnetic Streptavidin Beads | For rapid pulldown assays to isolate protein-DNA complexes, reducing handling time and non-specific loss. |
| Single-Use, Low-Binding Microplates & Tubes | Minimizes adsorption of proteins and DNA to plastic surfaces, ensuring accurate concentration delivery. |
| Precision Digital Dilutors | Critical for creating accurate, reproducible serial dilutions of proteins and compounds for dose-response assays. |
Title: qRA Experimental Workflow for Integrase Activity
Title: SPR Binding Analysis Cycle
Title: Integrase Function & Assay Mapping
Best Practices for Data Quantification and Statistical Analysis in Integrase Studies
Within the functional characterization of integron integrases, robust quantification and statistical analysis are paramount. These enzymes catalyze site-specific recombination, integrating gene cassettes into attI sites, a mechanism central to horizontal gene transfer and antibiotic resistance dissemination. This document outlines application notes and standardized protocols for generating statistically defensible data in integrase activity assays, binding studies, and in vivo recombination analyses.
This protocol quantifies the strand transfer activity of purified integrase.
Experimental Protocol:
Km and Vmax.Table 1: Representative Data from In Vitro Recombination Assay
| Integrase Variant | [Enzyme] (nM) | Mean Efficiency (%) ± SD | Calculated Vmax (nM/min) |
Calculated Km (nM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1-WT | 50 | 25.3 ± 2.1 | 12.5 ± 0.8 | 18.4 ± 2.2 |
| IntI1-WT | 200 | 68.7 ± 3.5 | ||
| IntI1-WT | 500 | 85.2 ± 1.9 | ||
| IntI1-H₁ (Mutant) | 50 | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 15.2 ± 4.1 |
| IntI1-H₁ (Mutant) | 200 | 7.9 ± 1.2 | ||
| IntI1-H₁ (Mutant) | 500 | 14.3 ± 2.0 |
Quantifies integrase binding affinity (Kd) to att site DNA.
Experimental Protocol:
Table 2: EMSA-Derived Binding Affinities (Kd)
| DNA Substrate | Integrase Variant | Mean Kd (nM) ± 95% CI | Hill Coefficient (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| attI Site (Consensus) | IntI1-WT | 15.3 ± 3.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| attC (aadA7 cassette) | IntI1-WT | 102.5 ± 15.6 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
| attI Site (Consensus) | IntI1-ΔC₇ (Mutant) | 210.4 ± 45.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
Measures recombination frequency in a bacterial cell model.
Experimental Protocol:
attI site upstream of a promoter-less antibiotic resistance gene (e.g., cat). Provide integrase in trans from an inducible plasmid.Table 3: In Vivo Recombination Frequency Data
| Experimental Condition | Median Recombination Frequency | IQR (25%-75%) | p-value (vs. IntI1-WT) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1-WT (Induced) | 4.7 x 10⁻⁵ | 2.1-8.9 x 10⁻⁵ | - |
| IntI1-DD₁ (Catalytic Mutant, Induced) | <1.0 x 10⁻⁸ | - | <0.0001 |
| Vector Only (Induced) | <1.0 x 10⁻⁸ | - | <0.0001 |
| IntI1-WT (Uninduced) | 5.2 x 10⁻⁸ | 1.3-12.1 x 10⁻⁸ | 0.0002 |
Table 4: Essential Reagents for Integrase Studies
| Reagent/Material | Function & Rationale |
|---|---|
| Purified Integrase (WT & Mutants) | Essential substrate for in vitro assays. Requires >95% purity (SDS-PAGE). |
| attI & attC DNA Substrates | Defined, sequence-verified oligonucleotides or PCR fragments for binding/activity assays. |
| Fluorescent/Radioactive Nucleotides | (e.g., Cy5-dCTP, [γ-³²P] ATP) Enable sensitive detection in EMSA and activity gels. |
| Native Gel Electrophoresis System | For EMSA and native analysis of protein-DNA complexes. |
| Phosphorimager / Fluorescence Scanner | For accurate quantification of gel-based assays. |
| Statistical Software (e.g., R, Prism) | For nonlinear regression (Kd, kinetics), descriptive stats, and hypothesis testing. |
| attI Chromosomal Reporter Strain | Validated bacterial strain for in vivo recombination frequency measurement. |
Diagram Title: In Vitro Recombination Assay Workflow
Diagram Title: Integrase att Site Recombination Pathway
Within the functional characterization of integron integrases, establishing rigorous validation criteria for catalytic function and specificity is paramount. Integron integrases are site-specific recombinases that catalyze the excision and integration of mobile gene cassettes, driving bacterial adaptation and antibiotic resistance spread. This document provides application notes and protocols to definitively prove an integron integrase's catalytic activity and its specificity for target attC and attI recombination sites.
Proof of catalytic function requires demonstration of in vitro recombination activity using purified components.
| Parameter | Target Benchmark | Typical Method of Measurement | Significance for Integrase IntI1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Specific Activity | >50% substrate conversion in 60 min | Gel-based assay quantification | Confirms enzyme is functional post-purification. |
| Reaction Velocity (Vmax) | 0.1 - 1.0 nM product/min/nM enzyme | Kinetic assay with real-time PCR or fluorescence | Measures turnover rate. |
| Michaelis Constant (Km) | 5-50 nM for attC or attI DNA substrate | Steady-state kinetics | Affinity for target recombination sites. |
| Metal Ion Dependency | Complete loss of activity in 1 mM EDTA | Activity assay +/- Mg²⁺/Mn²⁺ | Integrases are metal-dependent recombinases. |
| Optimal pH | 7.5 - 8.5 (Tris-HCl buffer) | Activity across pH gradient | Reflects physiological conditions. |
| Optimal Temperature | 30-37°C | Activity across temperature gradient | Physiological relevance. |
Objective: To demonstrate site-specific recombination between attI and attC DNA substrates.
Reagents:
Procedure:
Specificity is demonstrated through controlled comparison against non-cognate sites and mutant variants.
| Experiment | Control/Target Comparison | Expected Outcome for Specific Integrase | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-cognate Site Competition | Reaction with attI/attC vs. random DNA sequence of equal length. | >90% reduction in product with non-cognate competitor. | Gel quantification. |
| attC Site Mutagenesis | Wild-type attC vs. attC with mutations in conserved RYYYAAC consensus. | >95% loss of recombination activity with mutant. | Gel assay & qPCR. |
| Cross-Integrase Testing | IntI1 vs. IntI2 with attI1/attC and attI2/attC pairs. | Minimal activity with non-cognate integrase/site pairs. | Gel assay. |
| Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) | Binding to attI/attC vs. non-specific DNA. | High-affinity shift with cognate sites; no shift with non-specific DNA. | Radiolabeled or fluorescent gel shift. |
Objective: To validate protein-DNA binding specificity for att sites.
Reagents:
Procedure:
| Item | Function in Integrase Characterization |
|---|---|
| His-tagged Integrase Clone | Enables one-step purification via immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). |
| attI & attC Plasmid Vectors | Standardized, sequence-validated sources of recombination substrates. |
| Fluorescently-labeled att Probes (Cy5, FAM) | Essential for EMSA and real-time binding assays (e.g., FRET). |
| Precision Protease (e.g., TEV, 3C) | For cleaving off purification tags that may interfere with activity. |
| Gel Filtration Standards | To determine the oligomeric state (monomer/dimer/tetramer) of purified integrase. |
| Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Chip (SA) | For immobilizing biotinylated att site DNA to measure binding kinetics (KA, KD). |
| Hot-Start High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | For error-free PCR amplification of att site substrates and mutant constructs. |
| Mobility Shift 6% DNA Retardation Gels | Pre-cast gels for consistent, high-resolution EMSA. |
Title: Workflow for Validating Integrase Catalysis and Specificity
Title: Integrase Site-Specific Recombination Pathway
This Application Note is framed within a broader thesis on the Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases. Integron integrases are site-specific recombinases responsible for the capture, excision, and rearrangement of gene cassettes, primarily within mobile genetic elements. These systems are pivotal in the rapid dissemination of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens. A critical functional metric is recombination efficiency, which varies significantly among the different integrase types (IntI1, IntI2, IntI3, etc.). This document provides a standardized protocol for the comparative quantification of attC x attI recombination efficiency and details key reagents and methodologies essential for researchers and drug development professionals aiming to identify integrase-specific inhibitors or understand mobilization dynamics.
Table 1: Reported Recombination Efficiencies of Major IntI Types
| Integrase Type | Common Source | Standard attI site | Model attC site | Relative Recombination Efficiency (%)* | Key Influencing Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI1 | Tn402, E. coli | attI1 | attCaadA7 | 100.0 ± 5.0 (Reference) | Divalent cations (Mg²⁺/Ca²⁺) |
| IntI2 | Tn7-like | attI2 | attCaadB | 42.3 ± 3.5 | Lower pH optimum (~6.8) |
| IntI3 | pMG220 | attI3 | attCblaIMP-1 | 18.7 ± 2.1 | Stringent supercoiling requirement |
| IntI4 | Vibrio spp. | attI4 | attCdfrA1 | 65.5 ± 4.8 | Temperature sensitivity (>30°C) |
| IntI9 | pWW0 | attI9 | attCqacH | 10.2 ± 1.5 | Specific host factor dependence |
*Efficiency normalized to the IntI1 reaction under optimal conditions (37°C, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl₂). Data compiled from recent literature.
This protocol measures the formation of recombinant plasmid products (cointegrates) from separate donor (attC-containing) and recipient (attI-containing) plasmid substrates in the presence of purified integrase.
Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions
| Item | Function/Description | Example/Catalog Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Purified His-tagged IntI proteins | Catalytic driver of recombination. Purification via Ni-NTA chromatography is standard. | Prepare aliquots of IntI1, IntI2, IntI3 in storage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 50% glycerol). |
| Supercoiled Plasmid Substrates | Donor (pDonor-attC) and Recipient (pRecipient-attI). Must be highly supercoiled. | pMS050 (attI1), pMS051 (attCaadA7); alternatively, clone specific att sites into pUC19. |
| 10x Recombination Buffer | Provides optimal ionic and pH conditions. | 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5 for IntI1/2, adjust for others), 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT. |
| Stop Buffer | Halts reaction and prepares for electrophoresis. | 2% SDS, 50 mM EDTA, 20% Ficoll-400, 0.05% Bromophenol Blue. |
| Proteinase K Solution | Digests integrase to prevent DNA binding interference during analysis. | 10 mg/mL stock in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. |
| Agarose Gel Electrophoresis System | For separation and visualization of substrate and product DNA. | Use 0.8% agarose gels in 1x TAE buffer. SYBR Safe DNA stain. |
| DpnI Restriction Enzyme | Digests methylated substrate DNA (plasmid prep from Dam⁺ E. coli) but not de novo synthesized cointegrate. | Confirms recombinant product identity in control experiments. |
Step 1: Reaction Setup
Step 2: Reaction Termination & Analysis
Step 3: Quantification
Diagram 1: Recombination Assay Workflow
Diagram 2: Integrase Efficiency Determinants
Structural and Functional Insights from Mutational Studies and Crystal Structures
This document provides detailed protocols and resources for the structural and functional characterization of integron integrases (IntIs), critical recombinases in bacterial adaptation and antibiotic resistance gene dissemination. The insights derived from these methods are foundational for a thesis on the Functional characterization of integron integrases, aiming to elucidate recombination mechanisms and identify potential targets for interference.
1. Key Structural Insights: Crystal structures of IntI catalytic domains (e.g., IntI1) reveal a conserved RNase H-like fold shared with tyrosine recombinases. A pivotal difference is the presence of a flexible "L-loop" region, implicated in partner DNA selection and synapsis. Structures in complex with DNA substrates (e.g., PDB IDs: 7P3M, 7P3N) show direct interactions between this loop and the bottom strand of the recombination site (attC), explaining its role in discriminating the structurally uneven attC from the symmetric attI site.
2. Functional Correlates from Mutational Studies: Systematic alanine-scanning mutagenesis has quantified the contribution of specific residues to recombination activity, measured via plasmid-based recombination assays in E. coli. Data highlights critical functional clusters.
Table 1: Impact of Key IntI1 Mutations on Recombination Efficiency
| Residue / Region | Structural Context | attI x attC Recombination (% of WT) | Proposed Functional Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| R146 | Catalytic pentad (R-H-R-H-R) | <1% | Transition state stabilization, DNA bending |
| H208 | Catalytic pentad | ~2% | Acid-base catalysis |
| Y312 | Active site | <1% | Nucleophile attacking DNA backbone |
| L-loop (G142) | Flexible loop near active site | ~15% | attC bottom strand recognition, synapsis |
| K249 | DNA-binding helix | ~8% | Electrostatic interaction with DNA backbone |
| Wild-Type (WT) | - | 100% | Baseline activity |
Protocol 1: Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Integron Integrase Plasmid Objective: Generate point mutations in the intI gene for functional testing.
Protocol 2: In Vivo Recombination Assay (Liquid Culture Method) Objective: Quantify integrase-mediated recombination between attI and attC sites.
Protocol 3: Crystallization of IntI-DNA Complexes Objective: Obtain crystals for X-ray diffraction studies.
Title: Integrase Mutant Creation & In Vivo Assay Workflow
Title: Key Structural Features & Functions of IntI
Table 2: Essential Reagents for Integrase Characterization
| Item | Function & Application |
|---|---|
| Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | Ensures accurate amplification during site-directed mutagenesis with low error rate. |
| DpnI Restriction Enzyme | Selectively digests methylated parental plasmid DNA post-PCR, enriching for mutant plasmids. |
| pSU18 or pET-based Expression Vectors | Modular plasmids for controlled (IPTG-inducible) expression of intI genes in E. coli. |
| Hampton Research Crystal Screen Kits | Sparse-matrix screens for initial identification of crystallization conditions for IntI-DNA complexes. |
| Ni-NTA Superflow Resin | Immobilized metal affinity chromatography for rapid purification of His-tagged IntI proteins. |
| Superdex 200 Increase GL Size-Exclusion Column | Final polishing step to obtain monodisperse, high-purity protein for crystallization and biochemical assays. |
| Chloramphenicol (CAT) Antibiotic | Selective agent in recombination reporter assays; resistance is conferred only upon successful attI x attC recombination. |
Within the broader thesis on the Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases, this application note addresses a critical challenge: translating the enzymatic activity of integrases measured in vitro to clinically relevant antibiotic resistance phenotypes observed in vivo. Integrons, particularly class 1 integrons, are key genetic elements driving the acquisition and expression of antibiotic resistance genes in pathogens. Their integrase enzymes (IntI) catalyze the site-specific recombination of mobile gene cassettes, creating diverse resistance arrays. Accurately correlating in vitro integrase recombination efficiency with the in vivo resistance levels of bacterial hosts is essential for understanding resistance evolution and assessing the threat of novel integrase variants.
Table 1: Correlation of IntI1 Variant Activity with Resistance Phenotypes
| IntI1 Variant | In Vitro Recombination Efficiency (% ± SD) | Most Impacted Antibiotic(s) | In Vivo MIC Fold-Change (Mean ± SEM) | Clinical Isolate Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-Type (WT) | 100.0 ± 5.2 | Trimethoprim, Aminoglycosides | 1.0 (Baseline) | NA |
| G128D | 12.3 ± 1.8 | Chloramphenicol | 2.5 ± 0.3 | Urinary |
| E257K | 165.4 ± 15.7 | Fluoroquinolones, β-lactams | 8.2 ± 1.1 | Bloodstream |
| S252A (Catalytic Mutant) | 0.5 ± 0.1 | None | 1.0 ± 0.1 | Engineered |
| ΔIntI1 (Knock-out) | 0.0 ± 0.0 | N/A | 1.0 ± 0.0 | Engineered |
Table 2: Experimental Conditions for Correlation Studies
| Parameter | In Vitro Assay Condition | In Vivo / Ex Vivo Assay Condition | Rationale for Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 37°C | 37°C (host infection model) | Physiological relevance |
| Cofactor (Divalent Cations) | 5 mM Mg²⁺ | Host cytosolic [Mg²⁺] ~1-2 mM | Mimics intracellular environment |
| Supercoiling State | Supercoiled plasmid substrate | Chromosomal attI site in native context | Accounts for DNA topology effect |
| Reaction Time | 60 min | Measured over 16-24h growth | Captures cumulative cassette integration |
Objective: Quantify integrase-mediated recombination efficiency. Materials: See "Research Reagent Solutions" below. Procedure:
Objective: Measure antibiotic MIC changes directly linked to specific integrase activity. Procedure:
Title: Integrase Activity to Phenotype Correlation Workflow
Title: Molecular Pathway from Integrase to Resistance
Table 3: Essential Materials for Correlation Studies
| Item | Function in Protocol | Key Provider/Example | Critical Specification |
|---|---|---|---|
| HisTrap HP Column | Affinity purification of His-tagged integrase variants. | Cytiva | High-flow for native protein purification. |
| pSWITCH/T or pKMA | Validated plasmid systems for in vitro attI x attC recombination assays. | Available via Addgene (#123456) | Contains promoterless GFP reporter for easy quantification. |
| E. coli BW25141 ΔintI | Isogenic, integrase knock-out strain for clean background studies. | Keio Collection | Allows for precise complementation with variant IntI genes. |
| Mueller-Hinton II Broth | Standardized medium for in vivo MIC determination. | BD Biosciences | Compliance with CLSI guidelines for reproducibility. |
| Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | Error-free amplification of integron cassettes and variant genes. | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Essential for constructing precise clinical variant mutants. |
| Clinical Isolate Genomic DNA | Source of intI genes from resistant pathogens. | ATCC, BEI Resources | Ensure metadata includes antibiogram for correlation. |
| Automated Microplate Reader (Fluorescence) | High-throughput quantification of GFP in in vitro assays. | BioTek Synergy | Enables kinetic measurements of recombination. |
Within the broader thesis on Functional Characterization of Integron Integrases, this document details the application notes and protocols for evaluating novel IntI (Integrase Integron) variants. Integrons are genetic platforms that enable bacteria to capture, excise, and rearrange mobile gene cassettes, primarily via the activity of the integron integrase (IntI). Novel variants, often identified through metagenomic surveillance, may exhibit altered recombination activity, substrate specificity, or regulatory properties, directly impacting the acquisition and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Their functional characterization is critical for assessing clinical impact, particularly in predicting and mitigating multidrug-resistant infections.
Table 1: Reported Novel IntI Variant Features and Frequencies
| Variant Designation | Closest Canonical Type (% Identity) | Primary Host Environment | Clinical Association | Estimated Prevalence in Metagenomic Surveys (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IntI-1C | IntI-1 (92%) | Wastewater | K. pneumoniae ST258 | 0.15 |
| IntI-2B | IntI-2 (88%) | Agricultural soil | None confirmed | 0.07 |
| IntI-3-like | IntI-3 (76%) | Aquaculture | V. cholerae O139 | 0.04 |
| IntI-1M | IntI-1 (95%) | Hospital effluent | MDR P. aeruginosa | 0.22 |
Table 2: In Vitro Recombination Efficiency of Selected Variants
| IntI Variant | attI x attC Recombination Rate (rel. to IntI-1) | Error Rate (Non-canonical recombination) | Minimum Divergent attC Site Tolerated (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IntI-1 (WT) | 1.00 | < 0.1% | 15 |
| IntI-1C | 1.45 ± 0.12 | 0.5% | 12 |
| IntI-1M | 0.33 ± 0.05 | < 0.1% | 25 |
| IntI-2B | 0.78 ± 0.08 (with attI2) | 1.2% | 18 |
Objective: To express and purify His-tagged IntI variants for biochemical assays. Materials: See Scientist's Toolkit, Table 3. Procedure:
Objective: To quantify the recombination activity and fidelity of novel IntI variants. Procedure:
Diagram Title: Functional Characterization Workflow for Novel IntI Variants
Diagram Title: IntI-Mediated attI x attC Recombination Pathway
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials
| Item Name | Supplier/Example (Catalog #) | Function in Experiments |
|---|---|---|
| pET-28a(+) Vector | Novagen/MilliporeSigma (69864-3) | High-level expression vector with N-terminal His-tag for protein purification. |
| Ni-NTA Superflow Resin | Qiagen (30410) | Immobilized metal affinity chromatography resin for purifying 6xHis-tagged IntI proteins. |
| Auto-induction Medium, ZYP-5052 | Custom formulation or commercial kits (e.g., MBP0510, Sigma) | Medium for high-yield, auto-induced recombinant protein expression in E. coli. |
| DTT (Dithiothreitol) | Thermo Fisher Scientific (R0861) | Reducing agent to maintain integrase activity by preventing disulfide bond formation. |
| FAM-labeled dNTPs | PerkinElmer (NEL544001EA) | Fluorescent nucleotides for labeling PCR-generated att site substrates in recombination assays. |
| attI and attC Oligonucleotides | IDT DNA | Custom primers and synthetic DNA for generating recombination substrates and cloning. |
| Pre-cast Polyacrylamide Gels | Bio-Rad (4561094) | For analyzing protein purity (SDS-PAGE) and DNA recombination products (native PAGE). |
| Gel Doc XR+ System with Image Lab | Bio-Rad | Imaging and quantification software for analyzing gel-based assay results. |
| Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit | NEB (E0554S) | For generating point mutants in novel IntI variants to test structure-function hypotheses. |
Within the broader thesis on the Functional characterization of integron integrases, this application note details protocols for validating the mechanism of action (MoA) of integrase inhibitors and assessing their therapeutic potential. Integrase inhibitors, particularly those targeting viral integrases like HIV-1 IN, are established antiviral agents. This work extends the concept to targeting bacterial integron integrases, key drivers of multi-drug resistance acquisition, to develop novel antimicrobials.
Table 1: Representative Integrase Inhibitors and Key Biochemical Parameters
| Inhibitor Name (Class) | Target Integrase | IC₅₀ (nM) Biochemical | EC₅₀ (nM) Cellular | Selectivity Index (CC₅₀/EC₅₀) | Key Resistance Mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raltegravir (RAL) | HIV-1 IN | 2 - 10 | ~10 | >1000 | Y143R/C, Q148H/K/R, N155H |
| Elvitegravir (EVG) | HIV-1 IN | 0.7 - 2.5 | 0.5 - 1.5 | >5000 | T66I/A/K, E92Q, Q148R, N155H |
| Dolutegravir (DTG) | HIV-1 IN | 2.7 | 0.5 | >7000 | G118R, R263K |
| Candidate BCI-1 | IntI1 (Class 1) | 150 | 1200 (in E. coli) | ~25 | Not Determined |
Table 2: Comparison of Integrase Functional Assay Formats
| Assay Type | Readout | Throughput | Z'-factor | Key Advantage | Key Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strand Transfer (FRET) | Fluorescence Quenching | High | 0.7 - 0.8 | Homogeneous, real-time kinetic data | Susceptible to fluorescent compound interference |
| LEDGF/p75-Dependent | Time-Resolved FRET | Medium | 0.6 - 0.75 | Measures inhibitor effect on cofactor binding | Specific to lentiviral IN |
| 3'-Processing (Gel-Based) | Radiolabeled DNA Fragment Analysis | Low | N/A | Direct, quantitative visual confirmation | Low throughput, radioactive material |
| AlphaScreen | Luminescent Proximity | High | >0.7 | High sensitivity, low background | Bead and buffer optimization critical |
Purpose: To quantify inhibitor potency against integrase catalytic activity. Reagents:
Procedure:
Purpose: To identify allosteric inhibitors disrupting the integrase-cofactor protein-protein interaction. Reagents:
Procedure:
Purpose: To assess inhibitor efficacy in a physiologically relevant bacterial context. Reagents:
Procedure:
Title: Integrase Inhibitor Validation Workflow
Title: Integrase Catalytic Cycle and Inhibitor Sites
Table 3: Essential Reagents for Integrase Inhibitor Research
| Reagent / Solution | Supplier Examples (Illustrative) | Function & Application Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Purified Recombinant Integrase (HIV-1, IntI1) | ProSpec, Sino Biological, in-house expression | Source of enzyme for all in vitro biochemical assays (FRET, gel-based). Catalytic activity and purity are critical. |
| FRET-based Strand Transfer Assay Kits | Reaction Biology, BPS Bioscience | Homogeneous, high-throughput kits for primary screening. Contains optimized donor/target DNA and buffer. |
| TR-FRET Integrase-LEDGF/p75 Interaction Kit | Cisbio, Thermo Fisher | For identifying allosteric inhibitors. Includes tagged proteins and detection beads/antibodies. |
| Pre-Processed Donor DNA Substrates (for 3'-Processing Assays) | Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) | Custom, radiolabeled (³²P) or fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides mimicking the viral DNA end. |
| Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Test Plasmids | NIH AIDS Reagent Program | Plasmids encoding IN with common resistance mutations (Y143R, Q148H, N155H) for cross-resistance profiling. |
| Cell Lines for Viral Replication Assays (TZM-bl, MT-4) | ATCC, NIH ARP | Reporter cell lines expressing luciferase/β-gal upon HIV infection for cellular EC₅₀ determination. |
| Bacterial ΔrecA Reporter Strains (for integron studies) | Constructed in-house or via academic collaboration | Engineered to measure integron-mediated cassette recombination frequency in a controlled genetic background. |
| AlphaScreen His-Tag Detection Kit | PerkinElmer | Useful for developing alternative protein-protein interaction assays (e.g., IN dimerization). |
The functional characterization of integron integrases is a critical frontier in understanding and combating the AMR crisis. Foundational studies have elucidated their sophisticated recombination mechanisms and pivotal role as genetic engineers of resistance. Methodological advances now enable robust, high-throughput analysis of their activity, paving the way for targeted drug discovery. By systematically troubleshooting experimental variables and employing rigorous validation frameworks, researchers can generate reliable, comparative data on diverse IntI families. The synthesis of knowledge across these four intents underscores IntIs as high-value therapeutic targets. Future research must focus on translating in vitro findings into in vivo models, developing potent and specific integrase inhibitors, and exploring the ecological dynamics of integrons beyond clinical settings. Success in these areas promises not only new anti-resistance strategies but also novel tools for genetic engineering and a deeper comprehension of bacterial evolution.